Hi,all
Recently i want to test carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 performance and test environment already have carbon1.1.0+spark1.6 and carbon1.1.1+spark1.6 and carbon tables generated.
I tried reading carbon tables generated from carbon1.1.0+spark1.6 and carbon1.1.1+spark1.6 as well as delete in subquery data generated from carbon1.1.1+spark1.6 using carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 roughly and all worked ok.
My question is do they have compatibility problems and may impare performance?Or should I regenerate carbon table using carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 ?
And I break my question into 3 parts:
1.Will IUD and other opeartion(like sub-query) works fine if use carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 to operate carbon1.1.0+spark1.6?
2.Will use carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 to operate carbon1.1.0+spark1.6 impare performance or should regenerate data using carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 while tesing carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0?
3.Will use carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 to operate carbon1.1.1+spark1.6 impare performance or should regenerate data using carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0 while tesing carbon1.1.1+spark2.1.0?
[hidden email]
孙而焓【FFCS研究院】