GitHub user jackylk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602 [CARBONDATA-1843] Add configuration to enable dictionary and complex type Improvement: 1. To improve usability, new carbon property is added to support dictionary and complex type, user can disable these features if not required 2. Block 'external', 'CTAS' syntax 3. Some other minor fix to catch exceptions - [X] Any interfaces changed? No - [X] Any backward compatibility impacted? No - [X] Document update required? No - [X] Testing done Yes - [X] For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA. NA You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/jackylk/incubator-carbondata basic Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1602 ---- commit 413fd02d640cfdadf1e39b5d923dc9c8337590cf Author: Jacky Li <[hidden email]> Date: 2017-12-02T11:02:10Z add config ---- --- |
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602 Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/1640/ --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602 SDV Build Fail , Please check CI http://144.76.159.231:8080/job/ApacheSDVTests/2030/ --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user jackylk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602 retest this please --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602 Build Success with Spark 2.1.0, Please check CI http://136.243.101.176:8080/job/ApacheCarbonPRBuilder1/1642/ --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user ravipesala commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602#discussion_r154514538 --- Diff: integration/spark2/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parser/CarbonSparkSqlParser.scala --- @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.parser import scala.collection.mutable +import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.TerminalNode --- End diff -- I think it is better handle these validations at precreate table listener so that main logic will be clean. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user jackylk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602#discussion_r154519644 --- Diff: integration/spark2/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parser/CarbonSparkSqlParser.scala --- @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.parser import scala.collection.mutable +import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.TerminalNode --- End diff -- You mean to move all validation logic to precreate table listener or just the CTAS validation? Anyway, CTAS will be implement soon, so that check is just temporary. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user ravipesala commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1602#discussion_r154523178 --- Diff: integration/spark2/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parser/CarbonSparkSqlParser.scala --- @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.parser import scala.collection.mutable +import org.antlr.v4.runtime.tree.TerminalNode --- End diff -- No, I mean these type of validations to move to listeners, actually we no need to add these validations to carbon layer. If other projects who want to block these operations can add their listener and just register it. I feel these configurations are not required. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |