Re: [DISCUSSION] CarbonData Integration with Presto

Posted by Liang Chen-2 on Jul 02, 2017; 5:11am
URL: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-CarbonData-Integration-with-Presto-tp16793p16977.html

Hi Bhavya

Currently, 1.2.0 propose to support presto version with 0.166.
Is there any performance difference between 0.179 and 0.166?

Regards
Liang


2017-07-01 13:12 GMT+08:00 Bhavya Aggarwal <[hidden email]>:

> Hi,
>
> Please find the configuration setting that we used attached with this
> email , we are running Presto Server 0.179 for our testing.
>
> Thanks and regards
> Bhavya
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 8:23 AM, linqer <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
>> Can you give me your all configuration files (etc/) of coordinate and
>> worker,
>> What configuration tuning did you make for carbondata?
>>
>> A lot of scenes in our company are using Presto,I have tested presto read
>> orc vs carbondata  , Carbondata is clearly inferior to Orc;
>>
>> During the testing, for performance reasons, we used replica join in
>> particular, and we increased the JVM codecache size. but these are equally
>> fair to both ORC and carbondata
>>
>> Carbondata_vs_ORC_on_Presto_Benchmark_testing.docx
>> <http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n
>> 5.nabble.com/file/n16849/Carbondata_vs_ORC_on_Presto_Benchma
>> rk_testing.docx>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-m
>> ailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-CarbonD
>> ata-Integration-with-Presto-tp16793p16849.html
>> Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list
>> archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>