Login  Register

Re: carbon data performance doubts

Posted by kumarvishal09 on Jul 20, 2017; 6:51pm
URL: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/carbon-data-performance-doubts-tp18438p18609.html

Hi Swapnil,

Currently it is not supported as numeric value should be written based on
their datatype in carbondata file and same need to be handled in filters.
It is a requirement pending in carbondata.

If you are interested, please have a look. Please let the community know
for any support required.

-Regards
Kumar Vishal

On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Swapnil Shinde <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> Ok. Just curious - Any reason not to support numeric columns with
> dictionary_exclude? Wouldn't it be useful for numeric unique column which
> should be dimension but avoid creating dictionary  (as it may not be
> beneficial).
>
> Thanks
> Swapnil
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:20 AM, manishgupta88 <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > No Dictionary_Exclude is supported only for String data type columns.
> >
> > Regards
> > Manish Gupta
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-dev-
> > mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/carbon-data-
> performance-doubts-
> > tp18438p18559.html
> > Sent from the Apache CarbonData Dev Mailing List archive mailing list
> > archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
kumar vishal