http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/DISCUSSION-Refactory-on-spark-related-modules-tp29488p30006.html
> +1 to Ravindra's suggestion.
>
> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Ravindra Pesala <
[hidden email]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jacky,
> >
> > I don't think it's a good idea to create new modules for spark2.1 and
> > spark2.2 versions.We should not create a module for every spark minor
> > version. Earlier we had a modules spark and spark2 because of major
> version
> > change and a lot of interfaces are changed along with it. If it is a
> major
> > version we can create module but not for every minor version. And
> regarding
> > the IDE issue, it is just a developer understanding of how to switch the
> > versions so we can have FAQ for that and also we can check the solution
> for
> > IDE problem.
> >
> > And about merging spark2 and spark-common module, There is no harm in
> > keeping all the RDD in common package as if you need to support any major
> > spark versions like spark3.0 in future may require separating the modules
> > again.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ravindra.
> >
> > On 6 December 2017 at 11:00, wyphao.2007 <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 在2017年12月06 11时44分, "岑玉海"<
[hidden email]>写道:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Best regards!
> > > Yuhai Cen
> > >
> > >
> > > 在2017年12月6日 11:43，David CaiQiang<
[hidden email]> 写道：
> > > +1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----
> > > Best Regards
> > > David Cai
> > > --
> > > Sent from:
http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.1130556.
> > > n5.nabble.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks & Regards,
> > Ravi
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Warm Regards,
>
> Sangeeta Gulia
> Software Consultant
> Knoldus Software LLP
>