Login  Register

Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

Posted by Liang Chen on Nov 27, 2016; 4:18am
URL: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3239.html

Hi

Agree with JB's point.

For next version, will use native SparkSession to instead CarbonContext, so it would be better if next version number cloud use 1.0.0 for distinguishing major API changes.

Please find the detail discussion of CarbonData integration with Spark 2.x : http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Spark-2-integration-with-CarbonData-td3236.html#a3238

Regards
Liang
Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote
+1

Good idea.

Generally speaking minor version is bug fix, major is breaking API and command change.

Regards
JB⁣​

On Nov 25, 2016, 10:00, at 10:00, sujith chacko <[hidden email]> wrote:
>+1
>
>Thanks,
>Sujith
>
>On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta" <[hidden email]>
>wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards
>> Manish Gupta
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal
><[hidden email]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > -Regards
>> > Kumar Vishal
>> >
>> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Raghunandan S <
>> > [hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> > > +1
>> > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 2:30 PM, Liang Chen
><[hidden email]>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi
>> > > >
>> > > > Ya, good proposal.
>> > > > CarbonData 0.x version integrate with spark 1.x,  and the load
>data
>> > > > solution
>> > > > of 0.x version is using kettle.
>> > > > CarbonData 1.x version integrate with spark 2.x, the load data
>> solution
>> > > of
>> > > > 1.x version will not use kettle .
>> > > >
>> > > > That would be helpful to reduce maintenance cost through
>> distinguishing
>> > > the
>> > > > major different version.
>> > > >
>> > > > +1 for the proposal.
>> > > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > Liang
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Venkata Gollamudi wrote
>> > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with
>lot
>> of
>> > > > > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements.
>> > > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-320?
>> > jql=project%20%3D%
>> > >
>20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.2.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY%
>> > > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Next version has many major and new value added features are
>> planned,
>> > > > > taking CarbonData capability to next level.
>> > > > > Like
>> > > > > - IUD(Insert-Update-Delete) support,
>> > > > > - complete rewrite of data load flow with out Kettle,
>> > > > > - Spark 2.x support,
>> > > > > - Standardize CarbonInputFormat and CarbonOutputFormat,
>> > > > > - alluxio(tachyon) file system support,
>> > > > > - Carbon thrift format optimization for fast query,
>> > > > > - Data loading performance improvement and In memory off heap
>> > sorting,
>> > > > > - Query performance improvement using off heap,
>> > > > > - Support Vectorized batch reader.
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-301?
>> > jql=project%20%3D%
>> > >
>20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.3.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY%
>> > > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think it makes sense to change CarbonData Major version in
>next
>> > > version
>> > > > > to 1.0.0.
>> > > > > Please comment and vote on this.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > Ramana
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > View this message in context:
>> > > > http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.
>> > > n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-
>> > > increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3157.html
>> > > > Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing
>list
>> > archive
>> > > > at Nabble.com.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>