RE: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

Posted by Jihong Ma on Nov 28, 2016; 9:03pm
URL: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3323.html

+1

A rich set of features are planned to be included into next release, and more importantly there will be external API changes introduced as we integrate with Spark 2.x, Carbondata deserves a major version jump as it gets mature/production ready and powerful in terms of rich functionality and better performance compared to other file format alternatives on Hadoop ecosystem.

Regards.

Jihong

-----Original Message-----
From: Liang Chen [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Saturday, November 26, 2016 8:19 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: CarbonData propose major version number increment for next version (to 1.0.0)

Hi

Agree with JB's point.

For next version, will use native SparkSession to instead CarbonContext, so
it would be better if next version number cloud use 1.0.0 for distinguishing
major API changes.

Please find the detail discussion of CarbonData integration with Spark 2.x :
http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/Feature-Proposal-Spark-2-integration-with-CarbonData-td3236.html#a3238

Regards
Liang

Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote

> +1
>
> Good idea.
>
> Generally speaking minor version is bug fix, major is breaking API and
> command change.
>
> Regards
> JB⁣​
>
> On Nov 25, 2016, 10:00, at 10:00, sujith chacko <

> sujithchacko.2010@

> > wrote:
>>+1
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Sujith
>>
>>On Nov 24, 2016 10:37 PM, "manish gupta" <

> tomanishgupta18@

> >
>>wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Manish Gupta
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kumar Vishal
>><

> kumarvishal1802@

> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > -Regards
>>> > Kumar Vishal
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Raghunandan S <
>>> >

> carbondatacontributions@

>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > +1
>>> > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 2:30 PM, Liang Chen
>>&lt;

> chenliang6136@

> &gt;
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Ya, good proposal.
>>> > > > CarbonData 0.x version integrate with spark 1.x,  and the load
>>data
>>> > > > solution
>>> > > > of 0.x version is using kettle.
>>> > > > CarbonData 1.x version integrate with spark 2.x, the load data
>>> solution
>>> > > of
>>> > > > 1.x version will not use kettle .
>>> > > >
>>> > > > That would be helpful to reduce maintenance cost through
>>> distinguishing
>>> > > the
>>> > > > major different version.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > +1 for the proposal.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Regards
>>> > > > Liang
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Venkata Gollamudi wrote
>>> > > > > Hi All,
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > CarbonData 0.2.0 has been a good work and stable release with
>>lot
>>> of
>>> > > > > defects fixed and with number of performance improvements.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-320?
>>> > jql=project%20%3D%
>>> > >
>>20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.2.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY%
>>> > > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Next version has many major and new value added features are
>>> planned,
>>> > > > > taking CarbonData capability to next level.
>>> > > > > Like
>>> > > > > - IUD(Insert-Update-Delete) support,
>>> > > > > - complete rewrite of data load flow with out Kettle,
>>> > > > > - Spark 2.x support,
>>> > > > > - Standardize CarbonInputFormat and CarbonOutputFormat,
>>> > > > > - alluxio(tachyon) file system support,
>>> > > > > - Carbon thrift format optimization for fast query,
>>> > > > > - Data loading performance improvement and In memory off heap
>>> > sorting,
>>> > > > > - Query performance improvement using off heap,
>>> > > > > - Support Vectorized batch reader.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CARBONDATA-301?
>>> > jql=project%20%3D%
>>> > >
>>20CARBONDATA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.3.0-incubating%20ORDER%20BY%
>>> > > 20updated%20DESC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20created%20ASC
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > I think it makes sense to change CarbonData Major version in
>>next
>>> > > version
>>> > > > > to 1.0.0.
>>> > > > > Please comment and vote on this.
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Thanks,
>>> > > > > Ramana
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > --
>>> > > > View this message in context:
>>> > > > http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.
>>> > > n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-
>>> > > increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3157.html
>>> > > > Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing
>>list
>>> > archive
>>> > > > at Nabble.com.
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>

--
View this message in context: http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-propose-major-version-number-increment-for-next-version-to-1-0-0-tp3131p3239.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list archive at Nabble.com.