Posted by
Niclas Hedhman on
Mar 07, 2017; 9:06am
URL: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Apache-CarbonData-podling-graduation-tp8176p8383.html
I think the wording needs tuning, and my own interpretation of the intent
has been,
Project claims itself to comply, and list any exceptions and why that is
the case.
I think that can deal with the invariance that exists.
Cheers
Niclas
On Mar 7, 2017 14:48, "Jim Apple" <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> > Actually, the Maturity Model can be a very nice framework to organize
> > incubation around.
>
> If you're talking about a platonic MM, then I agree. If you are
> talking about the MM at
>
https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html> ,
> I think it needs to be much more carefully written and much more
> accurate to be a "nice framework". In particular, "aims to capture the
> invariants of Apache projects ... A mature Apache project complies
> with all the elements of this model" is wishful thinking or outdated
> or both.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[hidden email]
> For additional commands, e-mail:
[hidden email]
>
>