Re: Removing of kettle code from Carbondata
Posted by
manishgupta88 on
Mar 13, 2017; 4:47am
URL: http://apache-carbondata-dev-mailing-list-archive.168.s1.nabble.com/Removing-of-kettle-code-from-Carbondata-tp8649p8725.html
+1
Maintaining 2 flows is a cumbersome process. Better to remove.
Regards
Manish Gupta
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 9:42 AM, QiangCai <
[hidden email]> wrote:
> +1
>
> To avoid redundancy code, better to do it after testing the new flow
> fully.
>
> Regards
> David QiangCai
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://apache-carbondata-> mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/Removing-of-
> kettle-code-from-Carbondata-tp8649p8724.html
> Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list archive
> at Nabble.com.
>