GitHub user SangeetaGulia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 [CARBONDATA-1412] - Be sure to do all of the following to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily: - [ ] Make sure the PR title is formatted like: `[CARBONDATA-<Jira issue #>] Description of pull request` - [ ] Make sure tests pass via `mvn clean verify`. (Even better, enable Travis-CI on your fork and ensure the whole test matrix passes). - [ ] Replace `<Jira issue #>` in the title with the actual Jira issue number, if there is one. - [ ] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt). - [ ] Testing done Please provide details on - Whether new unit test cases have been added or why no new tests are required? - What manual testing you have done? - Any additional information to help reviewers in testing this change. - [ ] For large changes, please consider breaking it into sub-tasks under an umbrella JIRA. --- You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/SangeetaGulia/incubator-carbondata CARBONDATA-1412 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #1316 ---- commit e100cd7f3d784b66be2745f7f1cfcb857208c4aa Author: SangeetaGulia <[hidden email]> Date: 2017-09-04T07:04:54Z Fixed bug CARBONDATA-1412 ---- --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- |
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at [hidden email] or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user SangeetaGulia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 retest this please. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user SangeetaGulia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 retest this please --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user jackylk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 I think it is not good to have both `CARBON_TIMESTAMP_MILLIS` and `CARBON_TIMESTAMP_DEFAULT_FORMAT` in CarbonCommonConstants. Why not using `CARBON_TIMESTAMP_DEFAULT_FORMAT` only and delete `CARBON_TIMESTAMP_MILLIS`? --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user SangeetaGulia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 @jackylk CARBON_TIMESTAMP_MILLIS is more precise in terms of time as compared to CARBON_TIMESTAMP_DEFAULT_FORMAT. Also, there were three formats defined for TIMESTAMP in CarbonCommonConstants 1) String CARBON_TIMESTAMP_DEFAULT_FORMAT = "yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss"; (It has maximum occurences in the project currently) 2) String CARBON_TIMESTAMP = "dd-MM-yyyy HH:mm:ss"; 3) String CARBON_TIMESTAMP_MILLIS = "dd-MM-yyyy HH:mm:ss:SSS"; Do you want to use one format at all places? If yes, please suggest me one format from the three available formats. --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user ravipesala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
Github user CarbonDataQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/carbondata/pull/1316 Can one of the admins verify this patch? --- |
In reply to this post by qiuchenjian-2
|
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |